{rfName}
Ac

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Citations

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Serrano, MaAuthorTort-Ausina, IAuthorQuiles, SAuthorSerra, RsiAuthorGarcía-Sanchez, TAuthorBernal-Pérez, SAuthorMolina-Mateo, JAuthorGómez-Tejedor, JaCorresponding AuthorRiera, JAuthor

Share

October 8, 2024
Publications
>
Article

Active methods in electricity and magnetism courses: Influence of degree, academic level and gender on student performance

Publicated to:Heliyon. 9 (10): e20490- - 2023-10-03 9(10), DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20490

Authors: Serrano, Maria-Antonia; Vidaurre, Ana; Meseguer-Duenas, Jose M; Tort-Ausina, Isabel; Quiles, Susana; Serra, Roser Sabater i; Garcia-Sanchez, Tania; Bernal-Perez, Soledad; Gamiz-Gonzalez, M Amparo; Molina-Mateo, Jose; Gomez-Tejedor, Jose Antonio; Riera, Jaime

Affiliations

Univ Int Valencia, Dept Educ, C Pintor Sorolla 21 - Author
Univ Politecn Valencia, Dept Fis Aplicada, Camino Vera S N - Author
Univ Politecn Valencia, Elect Engn Dept, Camino Vera S N - Author

Abstract

The performance of first-year students in electromagnetism (E&M) courses of different engineering degrees at a Spanish public university was measured using the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment (BEMA), a standard research-based instrument to assess students' understanding after attending introductory courses in electricity and magnetism. In all cases, Flipped classroom (FC) built on information and communications technology was used. The objective of this paper is to analyse if the gain in the BEMA pre and post-test results is influenced by several factors such as the degree, the students' academic grade, and gender. Moreover, as some studies have shown that the students' retention of the concepts was significantly stronger in active learning than in traditional approaches, a third BEMA test was performed by the students to analyse the long-term retention gain dependence on the same factors. Students from different engineering degree programs were asked to complete two BEMA tests during the course and a third one after a few months. ANOVA tests were used to analyse the existence of significant differences in gain between student degree programs, student academic level and student gender. Results have shown no differences in the BEMA performance by degree program, but significant differences were found by academic level and gender. Retention did not depend on the degree course but on the academic level. Mean gain value by academic level, and gender was obtained and concluded that the best students presented the best gain results and that gain depends on the students' gender: males outperformed females in the BEMA tests, although there were no significant differences in the course grades. It is thus necessary to understand these differences and to implement measures in daily teaching work to improve women's performance.

Keywords

And mathematics (stem) disciplinesBrief electricity and magnetism assessment (bema)Concept inventoryDesignEducationEngagementEngineeringFirst-year undergraduate studentsFlipped classroomGender differencesImpactInstructionLearning-performanceModelOnlinePhysicsRetentionScienceStudent perceptionTechnology

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Heliyon due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2023, it was in position 28/134, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Multidisciplinary Sciences.

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-08-14:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 49 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Serrano Jareño, María Antonia) and Last Author (Riera Guasp, Jaime).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been Gómez Tejedor, José Antonio.