{rfName}
Co

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Martinez-Alvaro, MCorresponding AuthorZubiri-Gaitan, ACorresponding AuthorHernandez, PAuthorCasto-Rebollo, CAuthorIbáñez-Escriche, NAuthorSantacreu, MaAuthorBlasco, AAuthor

Share

October 11, 2024
Publications
>
Article

Correlated Responses to Selection for Intramuscular Fat on the Gut Microbiome in Rabbits

Publicated to:Animals. 14 (14): 2078- - 2024-07-01 14(14), DOI: 10.3390/ani14142078

Authors: Martinez-alvaro, Marina; Zubiri-Gaitan, Agostina; Hernandez, Pilar; Casto-Rebollo, Cristina; Ibanez-Escriche, Noelia; Santacreu, Maria Antonia; Artacho, Alejandro; Perez-Brocal, Vicente; Blasco, Agustin

Affiliations

Biomed Res Networking Ctr Epidemiol & Publ Hlth CI - Author
Fdn Promot Sanit & Biomed Res Valencia Reg FISABIO, Area Genom & Hlth - Author
Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Anim Sci & Technol - Author

Abstract

Simple Summary In meat production, the fat within an animal's muscles, known as intramuscular fat (IMF), is key to quality. This study investigated how breeding rabbits for higher or lower IMF levels affect their gut microorganisms. We focused on a rabbit population that was bred over 10 generations to achieve either high-IMF or low-IMF levels. Our findings show that genetic selection changes the gut's microbial composition, with more noticeable differences at the genus level than at the broader phylum level. High-IMF rabbits had different abundances of Escherichia, Methanobrevibacter, and Hungateiclostridium microorganisms compared to low-IMF rabbits, amongst others. We identified four specific microorganisms that could predict a rabbit's IMF genetic line with 78% accuracy. This research highlights the link between muscle fat genetics and gut microorganisms, opening the possibility of developing microbiome modulation strategies to influence IMF in animals, which could improve meat quality.Abstract Intramuscular fat (IMF) content is important for meat production and human health, where the host genetics and its microbiome greatly contribute to its variation. The aim of this study is to describe the consequences of the genetic modification of IMF by selecting the taxonomic composition of the microbiome, using rabbits from the 10th generation of a divergent selection experiment for IMF (high (H) and low (L) lines differ by 3.8 standard deviations). The selection altered the composition of the gut microbiota. Correlated responses were better distinguished at the genus level (51 genera) than at the phylum level (10 phyla). The H-line was enriched in Hungateiclostridium, Limosilactobacillus, Legionella, Lysinibacillus, Phorphyromonas, Methanosphaera, Desulfovibrio, and Akkermansia, while the L-line was enriched in Escherichia, Methanobrevibacter, Fonticella, Candidatus Amulumruptor, Methanobrevibacter, Exiguobacterium, Flintibacter, and Coprococcus, among other genera with smaller line differences. A microbial biomarker generated from the abundance of four of these genera classified the lines with 78% accuracy in a logit regression. Our results demonstrate different gut microbiome compositions in hosts with divergent IMF genotypes. Furthermore, we provide a microbial biomarker to be used as an indicator of hosts genetically predisposed to accumulate muscle lipids, which opens up the opportunity for research to develop probiotics or microbiome-based breeding strategies targeting IMF.

Keywords

AbsorptionAcid-compositionCorrelated responsesDivergent selectionEnergyGenetic selectionGut microbiomeIntramuscular fatMeat qualityMetabolismObesityPropionateProtein-coupled receptorSuccinate

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Animals due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2024 there are still no calculated indicators, but in 2023, it was in position 10/80, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2025-07-16:

  • WoS: 2
  • Scopus: 2
  • Europe PMC: 4

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-16:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 11 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

    It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

    • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

    Leadership analysis of institutional authors

    There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (MARTINEZ ALVARO, MARINA) and Last Author (Blasco Mateu, Agustín).

    the authors responsible for correspondence tasks have been MARTINEZ ALVARO, MARINA and Zubiri Gaitán, Agostina.