{rfName}
Fi

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Flores-Leon, AAuthorPico, BAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Editorial Material

First Report of Neocosmospora falciformis Causing Wilt and Root Rot of Muskmelon in Spain

Publicated to:Plant Disease. 104 (4): 1256-1257 - 2020-04-01 104(4), DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-09-19-2013-PDN

Authors: Gonzalez, V; Garcia-Martinez, S; Ruiz, J J; Flores-Leon, A; Pico, B; Garces-Claver, A

Affiliations

Univ Miguel Hernandez de Elche, Dept Biol Aplicada - Author
Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Conservat & Breeding Agr Biodivers COMAV UPV - Author
Univ Zaragoza, Ctr Invest & Tecnol Agroalimentaria Aragon, Inst Agroalimentario Aragon IA2, Unidad Hortofruticultura,CITA - Author
Univ Zaragoza, Ctr Invest & Tecnol Agroalimentaria Aragon, Unidad Sanidad Vegetal, Inst Agroalimentario Aragon IA2,CITA - Author

Abstract

[No abstract available]

Keywords

FungiPathogen detectionVegetables

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Plant Disease due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2020, it was in position 29/235, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Plant Sciences.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 1.14, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 2.86 (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-23, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 17
  • Scopus: 18
  • OpenCitations: 14

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-23:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 10 (PlumX).