{rfName}
Ef

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Grant support

This project was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (AGL2011-30023) and the Valencian Government (ACOMP/2013/118). We also thank CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasilia - DF 70040-020, Brazil for a research fellowship grant.

Analysis of institutional authors

Calvet, SAuthorFerrer, PAuthorEstellés, FAuthor

Share

October 31, 2024
Publications
>
Article
No

Effects of nutrition on digestion efficiency and gaseous emissions from slurry in growing pigs: II. Effect of protein source in practical diets

Publicated to:Animal Feed Science And Technology. 209 137-144 - 2015-11-01 209(), DOI: doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.07.021

Authors: Beccaccia, A; Cerisuelo, A; Calvet, S; Ferrer, P; Estellés, F; De Blas, C; García-Rebollar, P

Affiliations

Inst Valenciano Invest Agr, Ctr Invest & Tecnol Anim, Segorbe 12400 - Author
Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept Prod Agr, ETS Ingenieros Agranomos Madrid - Author
Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Ciencia & Tecnol Anim - Author

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate effects of protein source in practical diets on nutrient excretion and potential emissions of ammonia (NH3) and methane (CH4) in pigs. Three experimental feeds were designed to substitute a mixture of soybean meal and soybean hulls (SB diet) with sunflower meal (SFM) or wheat DDGS (WDDGS). The proportion of other ingredients was also modified in order to maintain similar nutrient contents across diets. Changes in protein source led to differences in dietary content of neutral detergent insoluble crude protein, soluble fibre (SF) and acid detergent lignin. Twenty-four pigs (8 per diet), weighing 52.3 or 60.8 kg at the first and second batch, respectively, were housed individually in metabolic pens to determine during a 7-day period dry matter (DM) balance, coefficients of total tract apparent digestibility (MAD) of nutrients, and faecal and urine composition. Representative slurry samples from each animal were used to measure NH3 and CH4 emissions over an 11 and/or 100-day storage period, respectively. Neither DM intake, nor DM or energy CTTAD differed among experimental diets, but type of feed affected (P

Keywords

Ammonia emissionAmmonia emission,digestion efficiency,growing-finishing pigs,methane emission,slurry,protein sourceBiomassComponentsDigestibilityDigestion efficiencyGrowing-finishing pigsMethane emissionMethane productionNitrogen-excretionPatternsProtein sourcePulpSlurry

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Animal Feed Science And Technology due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2015, it was in position 10/58, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2025-08-10:

  • WoS: 4
  • Scopus: 7

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-08-10:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 30 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is: